Edit Content
Search FSAS

How Google AI Overviews Are Changing Paid Search Forever

AI Search Is Changing Ads Not Replacing Them

New Google Merchant Center Download Feature Explained

The Future of Web Browsing Is Agentic and AI Powered

Why Content Clarity Beats AI in SEO Today

Why Your Google Impressions Dropped but Rankings Rose

Why Your Google Impressions Dropped but Rankings Rose

TL;DR Summary:

Reason for Impressions Drop: Google removed the `&num=100` parameter in September 2025, which previously allowed tools and bots to pull 100 search results per page. This caused artificial inflation of impressions from deep search result pages that real users rarely visit. The removal eliminated these non-human, bot-generated impressions, leading to a significant drop in reported impressions in Google Search Console.

Impact on Rankings and Data Accuracy: Despite the drop in impressions, average ranking positions appear to improve because the data no longer includes low-ranking keywords from pages 3 to 10. This change does not reflect actual ranking improvements but rather a cleaner, more accurate dataset, showing genuine user interactions and reducing noise from automated scraping.

Effect on SEO Tools and Strategies: SEO tools relying on the 100-results-per-page feature must adapt their methods due to limited access to bulk search result data. Website owners should recalibrate expectations for impression volumes, focus more on quality engagement metrics rather than vanity numbers, and adjust tracking methodologies to align with the new data reality.

Long-term Benefits and Strategic Responses: The data correction leads to more authentic metrics that better represent real user behavior, enabling clearer insights for content performance and decision-making. SEO efforts should emphasize user intent, genuine engagement, and quality content while adapting to evolving measurement standards, ultimately benefiting from more reliable and meaningful analytics.

Understanding the Recent Google Search Console Impressions Drop: What It Really Means for Search

The search landscape experienced a significant shift when users began noticing substantial changes in their Google Search Console (GSC) data. Many websites reported a Google Search Console impressions drop starting in mid-September 2025, accompanied by an unexpected improvement in average ranking positions. While this might seem contradictory, there’s a fascinating explanation behind these changes that reveals much about how search data is collected and reported.

The Real Impact of Removing 100 Results Per Page

Google’s decision to remove the option to display 100 search results per page might seem like a minor interface change, but its implications run deep. This adjustment has effectively reshaped how search data is collected and reported, particularly affecting third-party rank tracking tools that relied heavily on this feature.

The change primarily impacts how impressions are counted and reported. Previously, various automated tools and scrapers could artificially inflate impression counts by simulating user searches across extended result pages. By removing this capability, Google has essentially eliminated a significant source of non-human traffic from the reporting system.

Why Your Impressions Dropped But Rankings Improved

The recent Google Search Console impressions drop might appear alarming at first glance, but it actually represents a positive shift toward more accurate data. The removal of artificially inflated impressions has led to a cleaner dataset that better reflects real user behavior and genuine search interactions.

Think of it like cleaning a dirty window – while the light might seem dimmer initially, what you’re seeing is actually clearer and more accurate. The improvement in average position metrics isn’t due to any algorithmic changes but rather the removal of noise from the data.

Impact on SEO Tools and Measurement

The SEO tool ecosystem has been significantly affected by this change. Many popular rank tracking tools relied on the ability to view 100 results per page for their functionality. These tools now need to adapt their methodologies to maintain accuracy in performance tracking.

For website owners and marketers, this means:

  • Recalibrating expectations for impression volumes
  • Adjusting tracking tools and methodologies
  • Focusing more on quality metrics over quantity
  • Understanding the difference between real and artificial traffic

Making Sense of the New Metrics

The refined impression data offers a more authentic picture of search performance. While the Google Search Console impressions drop might seem concerning, it actually provides several benefits:

  1. More accurate engagement metrics
  2. Better understanding of real user behavior
  3. Clearer insights into content performance
  4. More reliable data for decision-making

This change encourages a shift from vanity metrics to meaningful engagement indicators. It’s an opportunity to focus on creating content that genuinely resonates with users rather than chasing inflated numbers.

Strategic Adaptations for Better Search Performance

The evolution of search console reporting necessitates some strategic adjustments:

  • Focus on user intent and experience
  • Create content that drives genuine engagement
  • Monitor real user interactions more closely
  • Adapt to new measurement methodologies
  • Emphasize quality over quantity in reporting

These changes reinforce the importance of maintaining flexibility in search strategy while staying focused on providing value to real users.

Moving Forward with Cleaner Data

This shift in how Google reports search data marks an important moment in search analytics. While the immediate impact might show as a decrease in impressions, the long-term benefit of having cleaner, more reliable data far outweighs any temporary discomfort from adjusted metrics.

What’s particularly interesting is how this change might influence future developments in search analytics and tracking tools. Could this be the first step toward an entirely new approach to measuring search performance that prioritizes quality over quantity in unprecedented ways?


Scroll to Top